Summarize conversation results in additional burning of premium requests #161264
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Product Feedback
Copilot Feature Area
Copilot Agent Mode
Body
The agent has to perform additional premium requests after a summary has been generated to restore knowledge or information lost after the summary. This reduces the number of premium requests for actual work.
After a summary conversation, the agent sometimes repeats work or research they did before. This is likely due to this information not carrying through the summarization, which is going to burn through premium requests.
The quality of the summarization will affect the agent's actions. A summary might contextualize what is happening in the agent session, but this might be biased to a specific context. Sometimes, the agent needs to be reminded of details that were covered very early in the session, resulting in using more premium requests. Other times, the agent, based upon the summary, will need to look at files again before it resumes the tasks it was working on.
Perhaps using the thumbs down can help provide feedback that some responses are perceived to be negatively impacting users' premium request budgets.
The agent can burn through the premium requests by getting enough information to understand the task. Some tasks require the agent to understand details from many different files, which must be repeated each new agent session. Using a README.md does help; it reduces the agent's search for all files, but it does not provide the details that the actual code offers. In some projects, there are several premium requests the agent must perform to start a task, which significantly limits their ability to be used.
I have a project where almost every task begins with informing the agent about a file that provides an overview and details about the project. However, the agent still has to access the source code of various components to have enough working knowledge to be functional. It also has to request and read other files to understand how to use other classes.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions