GitHub Project without a repository shows only drafts #61282
Replies: 6 comments 3 replies
-
|
Hey @Zerotask - thanks for being so active in the community, we appreciate all the feedback you've left and hope you keep it coming ✨ There is not an option to have the "Draft" removed without it being connected to a repository. A workaround would be to create an empty repository that is only used for those Issues which may not be what you're looking for. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I'm seeing folx with similar confusion on a project. It seems this is a problem with the semantics of the UI content string. The word "draft" implies a lot about the state of the item's content, yet does not clearly communicate what's meant — which I assume is "item not yet converted to an Issue in a connected repository." Adding to the confusion is the implication that all draft Project items will eventually be converted to Issues. A couple UI solutions come to mind:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I guess for people that don't work with a mono repo, it will keep being a problem. For my development team an issue can span multiple repositories, but still have to be added to as an issue to a repository to not be a draft. To create an issue for each repository is not a good idea for us. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think this hints at a behind-the-scenes larger scoped question; why would issues need to be connected to a repository in the first place? The implementation detail that you can close an issue once a PR in some repo is finished should not hold any sway over whether an issue has to be in a repo, right? That's just a piece of automation that doesn't always happen and that doesn't need to have this issue<->repo mapping to work? Indeed, having issues not live inside of a repo would fix
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Select Topic Area
Question
Feature Area
Projects
Body
I'd like to use a GitHub Project solely for project management. If I create an item inside a column, it's flagged as Draft. As far as I know, this Draft status will be removed, if I convert it to an issue, which means it has to be connected to a repository.
Is there any option to have the "Draft" removed without being connected to a repository?
Guidelines
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions