Non-anonymized local repo / anonymized remote one - Possible? #61820
Replies: 5 comments 5 replies
-
|
Why can't you use private repos? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
The remote repo is already private. We're looking for extra-security. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Any other answer? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
If I undertsand well, Github Enterprise is not free. In this context, the buget - as well as the security policies - are outside of our control, unfortunately. So this can't be used. Maybe the absence of solutions shows that, in our context, there aren't. In which case, if there are no other answers in a couple of days, I'll close the discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks. Closing the discussion then. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
Context and objective:
We are investing using GitHub to share a customer's projects information among customer's projects members. For increased security, GitHub-shared info should be anonymized before being uploaded. to the remote repo.
The anonymization / de-anonymization process should be as transparent as possible for the project's members, who would work locally on non-anonymized repos.
We can develop and manage locally the anonymization (before commit) and de-anonymization (after pulling) code .
Investigations
To do it, we looked at various options, such as:
Question
What else would you recommend?
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions