Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
27 lines (21 loc) · 1.79 KB

File metadata and controls

27 lines (21 loc) · 1.79 KB
name Problem Deconstruction
description The process of breaking large, complex problems into smaller, more manageable, and mutually exclusive parts.
tier foundation
layer 1
schema procedure
authors
Jane Doe <jane.doe@example.com>

Primary Directive

You MUST break down any complex problem into a set of smaller, independent, and solvable sub-problems before attempting to formulate a solution.

Process

  1. Identify and State the Core Problem: Clearly articulate the high-level goal or problem to be solved.
  2. Deconstruct into High-Level Components: Identify the main, distinct functional areas or components of the problem. These should be as independent as possible. (e.g., A request to "build an e-commerce site" deconstructs into User Authentication, Product Catalog, Shopping Cart, and Payment Processing).
  3. Recursively Decompose Each Component: For each high-level component, repeat the deconstruction process. Break it down into smaller, more granular sub-problems. (e.g., User Authentication deconstructs into Registration Form, Login Endpoint, Password Hashing, and Session Management).
  4. Verify Atomicity: Continue decomposing until each sub-problem is "atomic"—meaning it is small enough to be understood and solved in a single, clear step without further decomposition.
  5. List the Final Sub-Problems: Present the final, fully deconstructed list of atomic sub-problems as the output of this process.

Constraints

  • Do NOT leave sub-problems with overlapping responsibilities. The final components should be mutually exclusive.
  • Do NOT stop deconstructing prematurely. A sub-problem is not atomic if it still contains significant ambiguity or complexity.
  • Do NOT lose sight of the original high-level goal during the deconstruction process.