Description
Hi, we are observing that Windows Server 2025 runner images (20250708.1.0) seem to have significantly less available disk space after the D: drive removal:
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
C:/Program Files/Git 150G 117G 33G 79% /
On the same image version, but prior to the D: drive removal, Windows Server 2025 20250708.1.0 images had
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
C:/Program Files/Git 150G 113G 38G 76% /
D: 150G 11G 140G 7% /d
140 GB of additional disk space through the availability of the D: drive.
Related, in Windows Server 2022 images (e.g. 20250710.1.0) that still has the D: drive setup,
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
C:/Program Files/Git 256G 163G 93G 64% /
D: 150G 3.4G 147G 3% /d
D: drive offers 147 GB of extra disk space.
After the D: drive was removed from Windows Server 2025 runner images, they only by default have ~33GB of disk space available. This is causing uncached LLVM + rustc toolchain builds for us to fail due to running out of disk space.
The available disk space question/concern was also echoed by @lazka in #12416 (comment) in [Windows Server 2025] image will no longer have D:/ drive accessible to users from 2025-07-14 #12416:
What will this change mean for disk space available to the job? Currently D: has 147GB of free space available, while C: only has 29GB.
But I don't think it was ever answered.
Questions
Is the reduction in disk space intentional?
Platforms affected
Runner images affected
Image version and build link
Image: windows-2025
Version: 20250708.1.0
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/16339294682/job/46157832226?pr=143684
Is it regression?
Yes, prior to D: drive being removed, there were way more disk space so uncached LLVM builds could succeed (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/16262531937/job/45910951990)
Expected behavior
Either:
- Available disk space is roughly preserved on the Windows Server 2025 runner images after
D: drive is removed, or
- It is explicitly clarified that the reduction in disk space is intentional. Or better, what disk space availability should users expect for these runner images?
Actual behavior
Available disk space is significantly reduced without explicit clarification.
Repro steps
Any larger builds using Windows Server 2025 images. This seems related to D: drive removal, not the exact runner image version.
Description
Hi, we are observing that Windows Server 2025 runner images (
20250708.1.0) seem to have significantly less available disk space after theD:drive removal:On the same image version, but prior to the
D:drive removal, Windows Server 202520250708.1.0images had140 GB of additional disk space through the availability of the
D:drive.Related, in Windows Server 2022 images (e.g.
20250710.1.0) that still has theD:drive setup,D:drive offers 147 GB of extra disk space.After the
D:drive was removed from Windows Server 2025 runner images, they only by default have ~33GB of disk space available. This is causing uncached LLVM + rustc toolchain builds for us to fail due to running out of disk space.The available disk space question/concern was also echoed by @lazka in #12416 (comment) in [Windows Server 2025] image will no longer have D:/ drive accessible to users from 2025-07-14 #12416:
But I don't think it was ever answered.
Questions
Is the reduction in disk space intentional?
Platforms affected
Runner images affected
Image version and build link
Image: windows-2025
Version: 20250708.1.0
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/16339294682/job/46157832226?pr=143684
Is it regression?
Yes, prior to
D:drive being removed, there were way more disk space so uncached LLVM builds could succeed (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/16262531937/job/45910951990)Expected behavior
Either:
D:drive is removed, orActual behavior
Available disk space is significantly reduced without explicit clarification.
Repro steps
Any larger builds using Windows Server 2025 images. This seems related to
D:drive removal, not the exact runner image version.