Source: positioning review (upheld under challenge — highest-leverage missing asset, pure execution).
Problem: The README's whole "friction is the feature" credibility play is asserted in prose with no motion proof. README.md:18-19 still carries the commented-out DEMO TODO; docs/demo.gif does not exist.
It's ready to shoot: docs/demo-script.md is a complete 186-line shot list ending at the exact BLOCK -> resolve -> green beat, prescribing terminalizer with a point-and-click fallback. Follow the existing spec.
Do: record per the spec, drop docs/demo.gif, uncomment the README embed. Add an honest "dogfooded: codeArbiter builds itself through its own gates" line as founding proof until real users exist.
Effort: M (execution only, no design debate).
Source: positioning review (upheld under challenge — highest-leverage missing asset, pure execution).
Problem: The README's whole "friction is the feature" credibility play is asserted in prose with no motion proof.
README.md:18-19still carries the commented-out DEMO TODO;docs/demo.gifdoes not exist.It's ready to shoot:
docs/demo-script.mdis a complete 186-line shot list ending at the exact BLOCK -> resolve -> green beat, prescribing terminalizer with a point-and-click fallback. Follow the existing spec.Do: record per the spec, drop
docs/demo.gif, uncomment the README embed. Add an honest "dogfooded: codeArbiter builds itself through its own gates" line as founding proof until real users exist.Effort: M (execution only, no design debate).